logpaster.blogg.se

Clash of the titans 1981 film critique
Clash of the titans 1981 film critique







clash of the titans 1981 film critique
  1. #CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 FILM CRITIQUE HOW TO#
  2. #CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 FILM CRITIQUE MOVIE#
  3. #CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 FILM CRITIQUE SKIN#

This sea-monster is described as the “last of the Titans”, which is utter nonsense. Zeus decrees that Acrisius and the whole of Argos must be punished and orders Poseidon to “Let loose the Kraken”. Poseidon explains that things have happened as they feared. This seagull we’ve been following then turns into Poseidon (Jack Gwillim), who strolls across the floor, where the other gods have also gathered, towards Zeus (Laurence Olivier), seated on his throne. Eventually, we reach Olympus – where, I think, seagulls have no reason to be.

#CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 FILM CRITIQUE MOVIE#

(I won’t comment much on the clothes and equipment in the movie: they’re standard Hollywood fare and have little to do with history.) Throw ‘em in, I say!Īs the movie tracks the chest, bombastic movie starts and the title credits are shown, which shift at some point to helicopter shots of a landscape that is decidedly not Greece, with the black outline of a seagull superimposed awkwardly in some shots.

clash of the titans 1981 film critique clash of the titans 1981 film critique

The fact that his fantastical helmet doesn’t fit well is also a little jarring. The close-ups of Acrisius took me out of the movie, since you can clearly see that most of his molars are fitted with modern, silver-coloured fillings. The movie opens with Acrisius (Donald Houston) at the seaside, condemning Danaë and her infant son to a watery tomb by locking them inside a chest and throwing it into the sea. The story takes its cue from the Perseus myth, but also invents a bunch of needless stuff along the way. It was directed by Desmond Davis, though most people associate it more heavily with producer Ray Harryhausen, who created the creature effects for the movie. He hisses in a horse whisper: “What could be more beautiful than death?”īut that’s not nearly enough to engender the kind of fondness people feel for the original “Clash of the Titans,” campy though it is.The original Clash of the Titans was released in 1981. His part is surely the best in the movie and he’s clearly having fun.

#CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 FILM CRITIQUE HOW TO#

Arriving always with his head curiously fixed within a cloud of swirling black smog, he knows how to make an entrance. But he doesn’t supply the charisma that the movie needs and the whole thing feels like a joyless slog.įiennes’s appearances provide a jolt. With a crewcut atop his almost perfectly spherical head, Worthington grits his way through the film and does plenty of dramatic leaping while brandishing a sword. In “Titans,” his presence is more explicit but also less substantial. Worthington was largely eclipsed by the surrounding effects of “Avatar” it’s an interesting irony that few would be able to name the star of the biggest box-office grosser of all-time.

#CLASH OF THE TITANS 1981 FILM CRITIQUE SKIN#

Here, he trades aqua blue-colored skin for an equally artificial bronze spray tan in the mold of “300” torsos. Worthington, the Australian actor who stared in “Avatar,” knows a little something about 3-D. Though this is preferable to the distraction of most 3-D, it’s surely not worth the hike in ticket price. Audiences will hardly notice any increased depth. Like several blockbusters being released now in the post-“Avatar” environment, “Clash of the Titans” was made in 2-D but converted to 3-D in postproduction. He embarks on the familiar journey (particularly familiar for those who saw the recent, bouncier teen version “Percy Jackson & the Olympians”) in defeating a number of mythical creatures, including a serpentine Medusa and the sea monster Kraken - which, rest assured, is eventually released.ĭirected by Louis Leterrier (2008’s “The Incredible Hulk”), “The Clash of the Titans” will likely lure moviegoers chiefly by its digital effects (which are largely quite good but forgettable) and its promise of 3-D spectacle (which disappoints altogether). On Mount Olympus, that golden round table in the clouds, Zeus (Liam Neeson, in the part played by Laurence Olivier in the original) is angry at an ungrateful mankind and lets loose his brother Hades (Ralph Fiennes) to destroy the city of Argos.Īs a new citizen of Argos, Perseus (the son of Zeus) doesn’t much like this. Now, even the gods are spurned in their own movie: Deity is so out. It’s perhaps a fitting updating of the film for an era marked by distrust for political leaders and Internet-empowered masses. This time, Perseus (Sam Worthington) bears a distaste for his godlike nature: He just wants to be a regular dude and do normal guy stuff - like ride his winged horse Pegasus on the beach. That’s the twist inserted into the new “Clash of the Titans,” a remake of the sometimes fondly recalled, technologically dated 1981 film about the fury of the gods of Mount Olympus and the rise of the young, earthly demigod Perseus.









Clash of the titans 1981 film critique